Legal Titans Clash as Johnson & Johnson Talc Settlement Takes Unexpected Turn

Billion-Dollar Deal Sparks Lawsuit Among Plaintiffs’ Firms

In a dramatic twist to the long-running Johnson & Johnson talc litigation saga, a proposed multibillion-dollar settlement has ignited a fierce legal battle between plaintiffs’ law firms. This unexpected development adds a layer of complexity to what was already one of the most closely watched mass tort cases in recent memory.

5 Key Points

• Beasley Allen law firm has sued its former partner, The Smith Law Firm, over a proposed J&J talc settlement.
• The lawsuit alleges The Smith Law Firm violated a joint venture agreement to represent 11,000 talc plaintiffs.
• J&J reportedly added $1.1 billion to its previous $8 billion settlement offer to win Smith’s support.
• The Smith Law Firm denies wrongdoing, calling the lawsuit “baseless” and defending the settlement as beneficial for cancer patients.
• J&J plans to finalize the settlement through a third bankruptcy filing by a subsidiary company.

From Allies to Adversaries: The Rift in the Plaintiffs’ Camp

This week, the legal world was rocked when Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, a firm at the forefront of opposition to Johnson & Johnson’s settlement strategy, filed a lawsuit against its former partner, The Smith Law Firm. The complaint, lodged in Alabama federal court, accuses Smith of breaching a joint venture agreement that was meant to represent thousands of individuals claiming J&J’s talc products caused their cancer.

This unexpected legal salvo exposes deep fissures within the plaintiffs’ bar, potentially complicating the path to resolution for the tens of thousands of talc lawsuits that have dogged Johnson & Johnson for years. The healthcare giant, which steadfastly denies any wrongdoing and maintains the safety of its talc products, now finds itself an interested spectator in this internecine legal conflict.

The Billion-Dollar Carrot: J&J’s Settlement Sweetener

At the heart of this dispute lies Johnson & Johnson’s latest attempt to resolve the talc litigation through a bankruptcy settlement. Sources close to the matter reveal that J&J has sweetened its original $8 billion offer over 25 years with an additional $1.1 billion, specifically to win the support of The Smith Law Firm and its clients.

This substantial increase underscores the pivotal role Smith plays in the settlement landscape. As a leading holdout and the attorney who secured the first trial victory against J&J in the talc cases in 2013, Smith’s support could be instrumental in garnering broader acceptance of the settlement terms.

Allegations of Debt and Betrayal

Beasley Allen’s lawsuit describes financial strain and alleged betrayal. The firm claims that Leigh O’Dell Smith, the sole member of The Smith Law Firm, reneged on their joint venture agreement to secure a faster payout from J&J and escape mounting debts to litigation funders.

The complaint alleges that Smith, facing debts of up to $240 million to funders and $1.1 million in litigation expenses to Beasley Allen itself, secretly kept some talc clients for himself instead of bringing them into the joint venture. If proven, these accusations could have significant implications for the integrity of the plaintiffs’ representation in this high-stakes litigation.

Get a free legal case review today

Did you develop any of the following injuries after being exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? * Choose one Ulcerative Colitis Kidney Cancer Pancreatic Cancer Testicular Cancer Prostate Cancer Bladder Cancer Thyroid Disease Liver Cancer Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma None of the above Were you exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? *

YesNo

Which medication(s) did you take during your pregnancy? * Choose one Tylenol Acetaminophen Alka-Seltzer Coricidin Dayquil Excedrin FluTherapy Midol Mucinex Nyquil Panadol Robitussin Sinex Sudafed Theraflu Other Medication(s) Was your child diagnosed with Autism, ADHD or another condition? * Choose one Autism/Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Asperger’s Syndrome Kanner’s Syndrome Childhood Disintegrative Disorder Pervasive Developmental Disorder Other Medical Condition How old was your child at the time of diagnosis? *

Under 18 years old18+ years old

Did the accident occur within the last 2 years? *

YesNo

First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

ZIP Code *

Phone Number *

What is your case type? * Choose one -------------------- Asbestos Baby Formula Camp Lejeune Clergy Abuse CPAP Elmiron Exactech Firefighting Foam FTX Exchange Hair Relaxer Hernia Mesh Paraquat PFAS Roundup Sex Abuse Social Media Talcum Powder Tepezza Tylenol -------------------- Birth Injury Car Accident FELA Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accident Slip and Fall Trucking Accident Uber & Lyft Rideshare Workplace Injury Weight Loss Wrongful Death -------------------- Something Else

Human Verification *

I understand and agree that (a) submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship, (b) I am not already represented by an attorney for this matter, (c) the information I submit will be shared with a law firm, and (d) I have read and accepted the terms and conditions of the Privacy Policy, Terms of Service and Legal Disclaimer. Further, I consent to being contacted by a law firm or its agent after submitting this request.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

The Defense: A Better Deal for Cancer Patients?

Smith vehemently denies the allegations for his part, dismissing the lawsuit as “baseless” and defending his support for the settlement. “Attorneys can disagree on a matter without resorting to such petty tactics,” Smith stated, emphasizing that he believes the latest settlement offer represents a good outcome for women who have ovarian cancer.

This stance highlights the ethical dilemmas often faced by plaintiffs’ attorneys in mass tort cases, where the desire to secure compensation for injured clients must be balanced against the pursuit of maximum accountability from defendants.

Bankruptcy Maneuvers and Voting Strategies

As this legal drama unfolds, Johnson & Johnson is pressing forward with its settlement strategy. The company is reportedly preparing for a third bankruptcy filing by a subsidiary before the end of September, aiming to finalize the proposed settlement despite previous court rejections of similar attempts.

The extended voting deadline for the deal looms large, and The Smith Law Firm is now actively working to persuade clients to support the settlement. According to Beasley Allen, this effort violates the terms of their joint venture agreement.

Mass Tort Landscape Shifts

This unusual turn of events in the J&J talc settlement lawsuit shines a spotlight on the complex dynamics at play in mass tort litigation. It raises questions about the relationships between plaintiffs’ firms, the influence of litigation funders, and the strategies employed by corporate defendants to resolve large-scale legal challenges.

As the legal community watches closely, the outcome of this dispute could have far-reaching consequences for how future mass tort cases are handled and settled. For the thousands of plaintiffs awaiting resolution, this latest twist adds another layer of uncertainty to an already protracted legal battle.

The talc settlement lawsuit saga continues to evolve, demonstrating that the path to resolution in the high-stakes world of mass tort litigation is often as complex and contentious as the underlying claims themselves.