Denver Pharmacy Accused of Discriminatory Practices Against Employees with Hemophilia

Federal Lawsuit Alleges Violations of Americans with Disabilities Act and Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

In a shocking case of alleged workplace discrimination, a Denver pharmacy has come under fire for its treatment of employees with hemophilia. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed a lawsuit against Factor One Source Pharmacy, accusing the company of deliberately hiring individuals with hemophilia and then exploiting their medical condition for financial gain. This case has brought to light serious concerns about discriminatory practices in the healthcare industry and the potential abuse of sensitive medical information in the workplace. The allegations against Factor One Source Pharmacy paint a disturbing picture of a company prioritizing profit over its employees’ well-being and rights.

5 Key Points

• Factor One Source Pharmacy allegedly hired employees with hemophilia intentionally.
• Employees were pressured to buy expensive medications from the pharmacy.
• Those who refused to comply faced termination or forced resignation.
• The EEOC filed a lawsuit citing violations of ADA and GINA.
• A settlement of $515,000 has been reached with new ownership.

Deliberate Recruitment and Pressure Tactics

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, Factor One Source Pharmacy engaged in a targeted recruitment strategy that specifically sought out employees with hemophilia or those who had family members with the condition. The pharmacy allegedly asked job applicant’s intrusive questions about their medical history and current medications, information that is typically protected under privacy laws. Once hired, these employees were reportedly subjected to intense pressure to purchase their hemophilia medications directly from Factor One. This practice raised ethical concerns and potentially violated the employees’ rights to choose their healthcare providers and treatment options. The EEOC claims that the pharmacy went so far as to encourage employees to switch to more profitable medications, regardless of their current treatment plans or medical needs.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

The EEOC’s lawsuit paints a grim picture of the consequences faced by employees who refused to comply with Factor One’s demands. According to the allegations, workers who did not purchase their medications from the pharmacy faced termination or were laid off, regardless of their job performance. In contrast, employees who acquiesced to the pharmacy’s pressure and bought their medications from Factor One were allowed to keep their jobs, even if their performance reviews were less favorable than those of their terminated colleagues. This alleged practice created a hostile work environment where employees with hemophilia felt coerced into making healthcare decisions based on their job security rather than their medical needs. The EEOC also claimed that some employees felt forced to resign due to the treatment they received after refusing to change their medication regimens.

Get a free legal case review today

Did you develop any of the following injuries after being exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? * Choose one Ulcerative Colitis Kidney Cancer Pancreatic Cancer Testicular Cancer Prostate Cancer Bladder Cancer Thyroid Disease Liver Cancer Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma None of the above Were you exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? *

YesNo

Which medication(s) did you take during your pregnancy? * Choose one Tylenol Acetaminophen Alka-Seltzer Coricidin Dayquil Excedrin FluTherapy Midol Mucinex Nyquil Panadol Robitussin Sinex Sudafed Theraflu Other Medication(s) Was your child diagnosed with Autism, ADHD or another condition? * Choose one Autism/Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Asperger’s Syndrome Kanner’s Syndrome Childhood Disintegrative Disorder Pervasive Developmental Disorder Other Medical Condition How old was your child at the time of diagnosis? *

Under 18 years old18+ years old

Did the accident occur within the last 2 years? *

YesNo

First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

ZIP Code *

Phone Number *

What is your case type? * Choose one -------------------- Asbestos Baby Formula Camp Lejeune Clergy Abuse CPAP Elmiron Exactech Firefighting Foam FTX Exchange Hair Relaxer Hernia Mesh Paraquat PFAS Roundup Sex Abuse Social Media Talcum Powder Tepezza Tylenol -------------------- Birth Injury Car Accident FELA Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accident Slip and Fall Trucking Accident Uber & Lyft Rideshare Workplace Injury Weight Loss Wrongful Death -------------------- Something Else

Human Verification *

I understand and agree that (a) submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship, (b) I am not already represented by an attorney for this matter, (c) the information I submit will be shared with a law firm, and (d) I have read and accepted the terms and conditions of the Privacy Policy, Terms of Service and Legal Disclaimer. Further, I consent to being contacted by a law firm or its agent after submitting this request.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Privacy Violations and Legal Implications

One of the most alarming aspects of the EEOC’s allegations is the claim that Factor One Source Pharmacy shared confidential medical information about employees with hemophilia among their coworkers. This alleged breach of privacy violates ethical standards and potentially infringes upon several federal laws. The EEOC’s lawsuit cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). These laws are designed to protect individuals from discrimination based on their disabilities or genetic information and safeguard their medical information’s privacy in the workplace. If proven, these violations could have severe legal and financial consequences for the pharmacy and warn other companies about the importance of maintaining strict privacy standards for employee medical information.

Settlement and Future Implications

In early June, a settlement was reached, with Factor One Source Pharmacy agreeing to pay $515,000 in back pay and compensatory damages to affected workers. The settlement also stipulates that the pharmacy’s new owners will not employ or contract with the company’s prior CEO and owner. This resolution marks a significant victory for the employees who were allegedly mistreated and sent a strong message about the consequences of discriminatory practices in the workplace. However, the case also raises broader questions about the potential for similar abuses in other healthcare-related businesses and the need for stronger protections for employees with chronic medical conditions. The settlement and the publicity surrounding this case may prompt other companies to review their hiring practices and policies regarding employee medical information to ensure compliance with federal laws and ethical standards.

The Factor One Source Pharmacy case serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities faced by employees with chronic health conditions and the potential for exploitation in the healthcare industry. It highlights the critical importance of robust anti-discrimination laws and the need for vigilant enforcement to protect workers’ rights. As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, with increasing integration between providers, insurers, and pharmacies, ethical standards and legal protections must keep pace to prevent similar abuses from occurring in the future. This case catalyzes renewed discussions about privacy rights, healthcare access, and workplace discrimination, potentially leading to strengthened employee protections and more stringent oversight of healthcare-related businesses.