Pennsylvania Resident Awarded $78M in Latest Roundup Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Verdict

Multimillion-Dollar Verdict Intensifies Monsanto’s Legal Battle

A Philadelphia jury has delivered another significant blow to Monsanto and its parent company, Bayer, awarding $78 million to a Pennsylvania resident who developed blood cancer after decades of Roundup use. This verdict marks the latest chapter in an ongoing series of legal battles over the controversial weed killer’s alleged link to non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

5 Key Points

• The jury awarded $3 million in compensatory and $75 million in punitive damages.
• Plaintiff used Roundup for nearly 30 years (1992-2020).
• Monsanto has already paid approximately $11 billion in settlements.
• 54,000 active lawsuits remain pending nationwide.
• The company plans to appeal based on claimed trial errors.

Pennsylvania Man’s 28-Year Roundup Usage Results in Blood Cancer

William Melissen’s journey with Roundup began in 1992, culminating in a devastating cancer diagnosis in 2020. The 51-year-old Pennsylvania resident developed both non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and a form of leukemia, which he attributed to his prolonged exposure to the weed killer’s chemical components. His consistent use of the product over nearly three decades formed the foundation of his legal claim against Monsanto and Bayer, filed in 2021. The jury’s decision validated his claims, explicitly linking his cancer to glyphosate, Roundup’s primary active ingredient.

Bayer Monsanto’s $11 Billion Settlement Burden Continues to Grow

Monsanto’s legal challenges have resulted in approximately $11 billion in settlements across nearly 100,000 cases. Despite this staggering figure, the company faces an additional 54,000 active lawsuits. The latest verdict, combining $3 million in compensatory damages with $75 million in punitive damages, reflects the jury’s firm stance on corporate responsibility and product safety warnings. Attorney Tom Kline, representing Melissen, emphasized the verdict’s significance, noting it as another instance where a jury recognized what he termed Monsanto’s “outrageous conduct” over five decades.

Get a free legal case review today

Did you develop any of the following injuries after being exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? * Choose one Ulcerative Colitis Kidney Cancer Pancreatic Cancer Testicular Cancer Prostate Cancer Bladder Cancer Thyroid Disease Liver Cancer Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma None of the above Were you exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? *

YesNo

Which medication(s) did you take during your pregnancy? * Choose one Tylenol Acetaminophen Alka-Seltzer Coricidin Dayquil Excedrin FluTherapy Midol Mucinex Nyquil Panadol Robitussin Sinex Sudafed Theraflu Other Medication(s) Was your child diagnosed with Autism, ADHD or another condition? * Choose one Autism/Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Asperger’s Syndrome Kanner’s Syndrome Childhood Disintegrative Disorder Pervasive Developmental Disorder Other Medical Condition How old was your child at the time of diagnosis? *

Under 18 years old18+ years old

Did the accident occur within the last 2 years? *

YesNo

First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

ZIP Code *

Phone Number *

What is your case type? * Choose one -------------------- Asbestos Baby Formula Camp Lejeune Clergy Abuse CPAP Elmiron Exactech Firefighting Foam FTX Exchange Hair Relaxer Hernia Mesh Paraquat PFAS Roundup Sex Abuse Social Media Talcum Powder Tepezza Tylenol -------------------- Birth Injury Car Accident FELA Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accident Slip and Fall Trucking Accident Uber & Lyft Rideshare Workplace Injury Weight Loss Wrongful Death -------------------- Something Else

Human Verification *

I understand and agree that (a) submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship, (b) I am not already represented by an attorney for this matter, (c) the information I submit will be shared with a law firm, and (d) I have read and accepted the terms and conditions of the Privacy Policy, Terms of Service and Legal Disclaimer. Further, I consent to being contacted by a law firm or its agent after submitting this request.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Third Circuit EPA Ruling Central to Monsanto’s Appeal Strategy

Monsanto maintains that scientific evidence does not support a causal link between Roundup and cancer. The company’s defense strategy, presented by attorney Bart Williams, included evidence of Melissen’s cancer remission following a five-day chemotherapy treatment. Additionally, Monsanto cites a recent August ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which determined that Pennsylvania state law cannot mandate more extensive pesticide warning labels than those approved by the Environmental Protection Agency. This ruling forms a fundamental basis for their planned appeal.

$75M Punitive Damages Signal Warning to Chemical Industry

The verdict’s significant punitive damages component sends a strong message about corporate accountability in product safety cases. As thousands of similar cases await their day in court, this decision could influence future settlements and corporate practices regarding product warning labels and safety disclosures.