PFAS Contamination Emerges as Critical Threat to Texas Farmland

Legal Battles Unfold as “Forever Chemicals” Jeopardize Agricultural Livelihoods

The specter of PFAS contamination looms large over Texas farmland, with state courts becoming the battleground for determining farmers’ liability in the face of this pervasive environmental threat. As the Environmental Working Group reports an alarming increase in “forever chemical” sites across the United States, Texas finds itself at the epicenter of a growing crisis. The contamination, linked to serious health issues including cancer and liver damage, has prompted widespread concern and legal action. With public water systems in the Lone Star State revealing PFAS levels exceeding new EPA limits, the agricultural community faces unprecedented challenges that threaten the environment and the livelihood of farmers across the region.

5 Key Points

• Texas courts are addressing farmers’ liability for PFAS contamination on cropland.
• Over 50 public water systems in Texas exceed new EPA limits for PFAS.
• Biosolid fertilizers from wastewater treatment plants are a major source of PFAS contamination.
• Lawsuits target both fertilizer manufacturers and the EPA for negligence in PFAS regulation.
• An estimated 20% of U.S. farmland (nearly 20 million acres) may be affected by PFAS pollution.

Texas Croplands Face PFAS Peril

The discovery of PFAS contamination in Texas farmland has thrust the state into the spotlight of a nationwide environmental crisis. With over 400 public water systems tested, approximately 50 have shown PFAS levels surpassing new EPA thresholds. This revelation has sent shockwaves through the agricultural community, raising questions about the safety of farmland and the potential long-term impacts on crop production. The situation is particularly dire given the widespread use of biosolid fertilizers, which are often derived from wastewater treatment plant sludge and can be a significant source of PFAS contamination. Farmers who have relied on these cost-effective fertilizers now face the possibility that they may have unknowingly introduced harmful chemicals into their soil, potentially jeopardizing their farms’ future viability.

Legal Battlegrounds Over Biosolid Blame

The courtrooms of Texas have become pivotal arenas in the fight against PFAS contamination, with multiple lawsuits seeking to establish responsibility and secure remediation. A group of ranchers in the Fort Worth area has taken legal action against Synagro, a manufacturer of biosolid fertilizers, alleging negligence in the production and distribution of products containing PFAS. The lawsuit claims that Synagro’s failure to conduct adequate testing and provide proper product information directly led to the contamination of properties and water supplies. This case highlights the complex web of responsibility surrounding PFAS pollution, placing manufacturers under scrutiny for spreading these persistent chemicals across agricultural lands.

Get a free legal case review today

Did you develop any of the following injuries after being exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? * Choose one Ulcerative Colitis Kidney Cancer Pancreatic Cancer Testicular Cancer Prostate Cancer Bladder Cancer Thyroid Disease Liver Cancer Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma None of the above Were you exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? *

YesNo

Which medication(s) did you take during your pregnancy? * Choose one Tylenol Acetaminophen Alka-Seltzer Coricidin Dayquil Excedrin FluTherapy Midol Mucinex Nyquil Panadol Robitussin Sinex Sudafed Theraflu Other Medication(s) Was your child diagnosed with Autism, ADHD or another condition? * Choose one Autism/Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Asperger’s Syndrome Kanner’s Syndrome Childhood Disintegrative Disorder Pervasive Developmental Disorder Other Medical Condition How old was your child at the time of diagnosis? *

Under 18 years old18+ years old

Did the accident occur within the last 2 years? *

YesNo

First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

ZIP Code *

Phone Number *

What is your case type? * Choose one -------------------- Asbestos Baby Formula Camp Lejeune Clergy Abuse CPAP Elmiron Exactech Firefighting Foam FTX Exchange Hair Relaxer Hernia Mesh Paraquat PFAS Roundup Sex Abuse Social Media Talcum Powder Tepezza Tylenol -------------------- Birth Injury Car Accident FELA Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accident Slip and Fall Trucking Accident Uber & Lyft Rideshare Workplace Injury Weight Loss Wrongful Death -------------------- Something Else

Human Verification *

I understand and agree that (a) submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship, (b) I am not already represented by an attorney for this matter, (c) the information I submit will be shared with a law firm, and (d) I have read and accepted the terms and conditions of the Privacy Policy, Terms of Service and Legal Disclaimer. Further, I consent to being contacted by a law firm or its agent after submitting this request.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Federal Oversight Under Fire

In addition to targeting manufacturers, legal action has also been directed at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for its perceived failure to regulate PFAS in sewage sludge adequately. A coalition including Johnson County, the Potomac RiverKeeper Network, and the Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association has filed a lawsuit accusing the EPA of neglecting its duty to identify and regulate toxic PFAS substances in sewage sludge. This legal challenge underscores the multi-faceted nature of the PFAS crisis, implicating private companies and federal regulatory bodies in the ongoing contamination of farmland. The outcome of these lawsuits could have far-reaching implications for environmental policy and agricultural practices across the United States.

Farmers’ Livelihoods Hang in Balance

The economic impact of PFAS contamination on farmers cannot be overstated. In Maine, at least 60 farms have been found to have unsafe levels of forever chemicals, putting them at risk of closure. As testing continues in Texas, it’s likely that more contaminated farms will be identified, potentially leading to widespread agricultural disruption. The Environmental Working Group’s estimate that PFAS might be polluting more than 20% of all U.S. farmland—nearly 20 million acres—paints a grim picture of the scale of this crisis. This staggering figure represents a significant environmental challenge and a potential economic catastrophe for the agricultural sector. Farmers face the prospect of losing their livelihoods through no fault of their own, highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive support and remediation strategies.

Push for Legislative Action and Support

In response to the growing PFAS crisis, there have been calls for legislative action to support affected farmers. A bill introduced in 2023 aims to provide grants for farmers to invest in equipment, facilities, and infrastructure to maintain profitability while addressing PFAS contamination. This could include transitioning to alternative production systems or implementing remediation strategies. However, the bill has not gained traction in the House Agriculture Committee, leaving many farmers in limbo. Maine’s congressional delegation advocates for $500 million in grants to be included in the new farm bill for tracking and cleaning up PFAS. Despite these efforts, the reality remains that effective PFAS soil remediation is largely beyond current technological capabilities, and what is possible comes at a prohibitive cost. This leaves farmers in a precarious position, facing potential financial ruin due to circumstances beyond their control.