California's Paraquat Ban Gains Momentum in State Legislature

Paraquat Linked to Parkinson’s Disease, Prompting Legislative Action

California has taken a significant step towards banning the controversial herbicide paraquat, as a pivotal state legislative committee approved the measure on Thursday. The proposed ban, set to take effect on January 1, 2026, would prohibit the use, manufacture, sale, delivery, holding, or offering for sale of any pesticide product containing Paraquat. The bill includes a provision allowing state regulators to reevaluate Paraquat and potentially reapprove it with or without new restrictions.

5 Key Points

• California’s proposed paraquat ban is driven by concerns over the chemical’s link to Parkinson’s disease.
• Thousands of farmers, agricultural workers, and others are suing paraquat maker Syngenta, alleging they developed Parkinson’s due to long-term exposure.
• Internal Syngenta documents reveal the company’s awareness of Paraquat’s potential health risks and efforts to influence regulatory bodies and public opinion.
• Parkinson’s disease rates have been climbing in the United States, with the death rate increasing by more than 60% over the past two decades.
• Several countries, including the European Union, UK, Switzerland, and China, have banned Paraquat due to safety concerns.

Paraquat’s Widespread Use and Controversy

Paraquat is one of the most widely used weed-killing chemicals worldwide, with farmers using it to control weeds before planting and to dry out crops for harvest. In the United States, the chemical is used in orchards, wheat fields, pastures, cotton fields, and other agricultural settings. Despite Syngenta’s claims that Paraquat is safe when used according to directions and with proper protective equipment, the chemical has been banned in dozens of countries due to acute dangers and mounting evidence of health risks, such as Parkinson’s disease, from chronic, long-term exposure.

Get a free legal case review today

Did you develop any of the following injuries after being exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? * Choose one Ulcerative Colitis Kidney Cancer Pancreatic Cancer Testicular Cancer Prostate Cancer Bladder Cancer Thyroid Disease Liver Cancer Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma None of the above Were you exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? *

YesNo

Which medication(s) did you take during your pregnancy? * Choose one Tylenol Acetaminophen Alka-Seltzer Coricidin Dayquil Excedrin FluTherapy Midol Mucinex Nyquil Panadol Robitussin Sinex Sudafed Theraflu Other Medication(s) Was your child diagnosed with Autism, ADHD or another condition? * Choose one Autism/Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Asperger’s Syndrome Kanner’s Syndrome Childhood Disintegrative Disorder Pervasive Developmental Disorder Other Medical Condition How old was your child at the time of diagnosis? *

Under 18 years old18+ years old

Did the accident occur within the last 2 years? *

YesNo

First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

ZIP Code *

Phone Number *

What is your case type? * Choose one -------------------- Asbestos Baby Formula Camp Lejeune Clergy Abuse CPAP Elmiron Exactech Firefighting Foam FTX Exchange Hair Relaxer Hernia Mesh Paraquat PFAS Roundup Sex Abuse Social Media Talcum Powder Tepezza Tylenol -------------------- Birth Injury Car Accident FELA Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accident Slip and Fall Trucking Accident Uber & Lyft Rideshare Workplace Injury Weight Loss Wrongful Death -------------------- Something Else

Human Verification *

I understand and agree that (a) submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship, (b) I am not already represented by an attorney for this matter, (c) the information I submit will be shared with a law firm, and (d) I have read and accepted the terms and conditions of the Privacy Policy, Terms of Service and Legal Disclaimer. Further, I consent to being contacted by a law firm or its agent after submitting this request.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Secret Syngenta Records and Influence

Assemblymember Laura Friedman’s office cited internal Syngenta documents uncovered by The New Lede and The Guardian, which reveal the company’s long-standing awareness of scientific research linking Paraquat to Parkinson’s disease. These documents also show evidence of Syngenta’s efforts to manipulate and influence the EPA and the publication of scientific literature supporting Paraquat’s safety. The company allegedly worked to mislead the public about Paraquat’s dangers and employed secret strategies to maintain the chemical’s market presence.

California’s Proactive Approach to Chemical Regulation

California has a history of taking quicker action than the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in restricting chemicals associated with severe health concerns. In 2019, after the EPA failed to follow through on plans to ban the insecticide chlorpyrifos, California announced its ban, citing evidence of the chemical’s association with impaired brain and neurological development in children and other sensitive populations.

The paraquat ban bill will now be voted on by the entire Assembly next week. A majority of 80 Assembly members is required to keep the measure alive. If successful, the bill will move to the state Senate for consideration.