Philips CPAP Settlement: A Comprehensive Overview

Foam Used in Philips Sleep Apnea Devices Causing Harm

The recent announcement of Philips’ $479 million settlement concerning its CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices has caught the attention of many consumers and legal professionals. As a specialist in the field of lawsuits and mass torts, it’s crucial to dissect the legal implications of this settlement and what it means for affected parties. 

Key Points in Philips CPAP Settlement Case

• CPAP Settlement Amount: Philips has agreed to a $479 million settlement over claims that the foam in its sleep apnea devices degraded, potentially releasing harmful particles. 
• Compensation for Consumers: Individuals who purchased, leased, or rented these devices may receive compensation between $55 and $1,552, plus an additional $100 for returned products. 
• No Admission of Fault: Despite the settlement, Philips maintains that this does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing. 
• Exclusion of Personal Injury Claims: The settlement does not cover claims for personal injuries or medical expenses incurred due to the devices. 
• Preliminary Approval Hearing: A preliminary approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for September 18, 2023. 

Massive Recall of 10+ Million CPAP Devices

The settlement stems from claims that the foam used in Philips Respironics CPAP, BiPAP, or ventilator devices degraded over time, releasing potentially harmful gases and particles. This issue led to a massive recall of about 10.8 million devices by Philips in 2021, following over 105,000 complaints to the FDA, including reports of 385 deaths. 

Consumers affected by this issue face a complex situation. While the CPAP machine settlement offers financial compensation, it’s important to note that it excludes claims for personal injuries or medical expenses. This exclusion could significantly impact individuals who have suffered severe health consequences due to the faulty devices. 

Philips Not Admitting Wrongdoing

Philips’ assertion that the settlement does not imply any wrongdoing is a typical legal maneuver in mass tort cases. This stance often helps companies avoid further litigation risks while addressing the immediate claims. 

The scheduled preliminary approval hearing is a crucial step in this legal process. It will determine whether the settlement terms are fair and adequate for the affected parties. Interested individuals can sign up for email alerts to stay updated on the case. 

Get a free legal case review today

Did you develop any of the following injuries after being exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? * Choose one Ulcerative Colitis Kidney Cancer Pancreatic Cancer Testicular Cancer Prostate Cancer Bladder Cancer Thyroid Disease Liver Cancer Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma None of the above Were you exposed to Fire Fighting Foam (AFFF)? *

YesNo

Which medication(s) did you take during your pregnancy? * Choose one Tylenol Acetaminophen Alka-Seltzer Coricidin Dayquil Excedrin FluTherapy Midol Mucinex Nyquil Panadol Robitussin Sinex Sudafed Theraflu Other Medication(s) Was your child diagnosed with Autism, ADHD or another condition? * Choose one Autism/Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Asperger’s Syndrome Kanner’s Syndrome Childhood Disintegrative Disorder Pervasive Developmental Disorder Other Medical Condition How old was your child at the time of diagnosis? *

Under 18 years old18+ years old

Did the accident occur within the last 2 years? *

YesNo

First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

ZIP Code *

Phone Number *

What is your case type? * Choose one -------------------- Asbestos Baby Formula Camp Lejeune Clergy Abuse CPAP Elmiron Exactech Firefighting Foam FTX Exchange Hair Relaxer Hernia Mesh Paraquat PFAS Roundup Sex Abuse Social Media Talcum Powder Tepezza Tylenol -------------------- Birth Injury Car Accident FELA Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accident Slip and Fall Trucking Accident Uber & Lyft Rideshare Workplace Injury Weight Loss Wrongful Death -------------------- Something Else

Human Verification *

I understand and agree that (a) submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship, (b) I am not already represented by an attorney for this matter, (c) the information I submit will be shared with a law firm, and (d) I have read and accepted the terms and conditions of the Privacy Policy, Terms of Service and Legal Disclaimer. Further, I consent to being contacted by a law firm or its agent after submitting this request.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Corporate Accountability vs. Consumer Protection

The Philips CPAP lawsuit settlement case highlights the intricate balance between corporate accountability and consumer protection in mass tort litigations. As the case progresses, it will be essential to monitor how this settlement impacts the broader legal landscape regarding product liability and consumer rights.